Sunday, May 5, 2013

Politics at Sulli: The REAL Message Behind The Debates: Collab Article

A collaboration article by K. Herbst-Reid and D. de Gracia

    On Wednesday May 1st, a group of Sulli students were able to experience what it was like to see first-hand what a debate between four political figures looked like. These four were Martin Hunt for the Liberals, Amrik Mahil for the NDP, Sara Sharma for the Green Party and Kevin Rakhra for the Conservatives. These four took to our auditorium and presented their “plans for our future” and their “plans for a better BC”. There was a question and answer period, but this raises the question: Why have a Q&A session when these four people dance around the questions anyway? Not sure what this is about? As a person there for myself and as a person who asked these people a question, I will happily explain.

Section by D. de Gracia

    Many students asked their questions to these people. We, and I say we because I was doing this myself, lined up behind a microphone to voice our questions. One student in grade 12 asked what the candidates would do about the prices of housing rising due to foreign investors. The candidates she asked basically said “It is out of our control, it concerns legislature”. Basically an “I don’t know.” I would write the rest of what they said, but it was just a dance around the subject. Another student, in grade 10 this time, asked a candidate about how they would try to help our parent’s generation. The candidate basically replied “By boosting/improving our economy.” How would they do so? They never said. When I asked my question about how they would help students with student debt after post secondary education, one of them talked about how their party would make plans to give children who are now 6 money to their parents so that they could build up money for post secondary education. But what about us? It’s a good sounding plan for future kids, sure, but what about us? The ones graduating in two years? Next year? Three years from now? That plan only helps kids graduating 12 YEARS from now. They went on and on about OUR future, and OUR involvements in Canada. But throughout all these questions, the candidates dodged them and didn’t answer us. What does it say about them?

Section by K. Herbst-Reid

One grade 11 student came up to the mic and was pretty gutsy, saying they were just dodging question after question and weren’t really explaining WHAT they were going to do to help us in the future. They keep going on and on about giving us money for education and helping the these generation. But HOW?  How are they going to get the money? What about the last generations and our parents? Our parents are having trouble too, and they should be helping everyone! Not just us. They have great ideas and have big plans but how will they carry them out? When election day comes, I guess we’ll just have to see.

What's your opinion?

No comments:

Post a Comment